2012Pubs
Understanding individual risk perceptions and preferences for climate change adaptations in biological conservation
Tam, J. and T. L. McDaniels. 2013. Understanding individual risk perceptions and preferences for climate change adaptations in biological conservation. Environmental Science & Policy 27:114-123.
Luck et al. in BioScience: Ethical considerations of ES applications
Luck, G., K. M. A. Chan, et al. (2012). “Ethical considerations in on-ground applications of the ecosystem services concept.” BioScience 62(12): 1020-1029. (pdf)
Spatial Prioritisation for Protecting Ecosystem Services
Luck, G. W., K. M. A. Chan and C. J. Klein. 2012. Identifying spatial priorities for protecting ecosystem services. F1000 Research. http://f1000r.es/S1ovvh
Geographic variation in a Temperate Reef Snail
Martone, RM and F Micheli. 2012. Geographic variation in demography of a temperate reef snail: importance of multiple life-history traits. Marine Ecological Progress Series 457:85-99 Link
Where are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement
Kai M. A. Chan, Anne D. Guerry, Patricia Balvanera, Sarah Klain, Terre Satterfield, Xavier Basurto, Ann Bostrom, Ratana Chuenpagdee, Rachelle Gould, Benjamin S. Halpern, Neil Hannahs, Jordan Levine, Bryan Norton, Mary Ruckelshaus, Roly Russell, Jordan Tam and Ulalia Woodside. 2012. Where are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement. BioScience. 62(8): 744-756 (pdf) cIRcle
Navigating coast values: Participatory mapping of ecosystem services for spatial planning
Klain, S.C. and Chan, K.M.A. 2012. Navigating coast values: Participatory mapping of ecosystem services for spatial planning. Ecological Economics. (pdf)
Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda
Daniel, T. C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J. W., Chan, K. M. A., . . . von der Dunk, A. 2012. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (pdf)
Moving beyond single-sector management to marine spatial planning (MSP) yields benefits – F1000 Review
Klain S, Chan K: “White et al. are the first to show how moving beyond single-sector management to marine…” Evaluation of: [White C et al. Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Mar 5; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114215109]. Faculty of 1000, […]
Biodiversity and ecosystem services F1000 review
Olmsted P, Chan K: “Mace et al.’s review should lead to an improvement in communication among conservation…” Evaluation of: [Mace GM et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Jan; 27(1):19-26; doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006]. Faculty of 1000, 01 Mar 2012. F1000.com/13492987#eval15395077
Modelling benefits from nature: Using ecosystem services to inform coastal and marine spatial planning
Guerry, A., M. Ruckelshaus, K. Arkema, et al. (2012). “Modelling benefits from nature: Using ecosystem services to inform coastal and marine spatial planning.” International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management: 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2011.647835